tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8005267955114382841.post8969509364473687079..comments2011-12-06T22:00:53.543-08:00Comments on Who needs art when you got a horse: Review: Repulsion (1965)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8005267955114382841.post-72154583944068517142011-01-17T15:43:56.844-08:002011-01-17T15:43:56.844-08:00Hey Dmitrij - hurrah! no missing 'gs' this...Hey Dmitrij - hurrah! no missing 'gs' this time. Thank you! :D This is your most 'credible' and 'academic' review yet - but you're still not referencing your quotes correctly and you're not providing an illustration list or bibliography. You HAVE to administrate your critical writing in this way, Dmitrij - if you don't get into the habit now of properly referencing your formal written work, you'll always make this same mistake: so, for the last time - here are the rules for your reviews - no exceptions:<br /><br />Reviews of the ‘The Unhomely Cinema’ Film programme. Please note – in addition to and support of your own critique, your reviews must include a minimum of 3 quotations from 3 different published reviews + poster art + supporting stills. Please note - Harvard Method must now be used for all quotations and all illustrations to be referenced correctly. Reviews are to include bibliography and illustration list.<br /><br />Follow this link for ‘how to reference’ conventions for all kinds of sources.<br />http://community.ucreative.ac.uk/article/25881/Referencing-specific-sources-of-information/<br /><br />(use it!)<br /><br />and finally - watch out for typos - 'pides the body'?tutorphilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11842833126210822641noreply@blogger.com